مقالات وأبحاث قانونية

The principle and exception to appealing by ordinary means in substantive judicial rulings issued in various legal matters (2_2)

The phenomenon of people dividing their money during their lives among their potential heirs has spread in the present era. Yemeni law has dealt with this issue in ambiguous and conflicting texts, as ambiguity surrounds this issue from every side. The Supreme Court of Yemen (the Court of Cassation) has diligently addressed this problem. It needs study and research to verify the extent of its agreement with Islamic jurisprudence and the texts of Yemeni law, and then draw conclusions and provide appropriate recommendations on this subject.

Some people wonder about the difference between the original entitlement lawsuit and the subsidiary entitlement lawsuit? Why was the subsidiary entitlement lawsuit given this name? When are each presented? And from whom? To which court do you apply?

An important legal article entitled marginal theft in Yemeni criminal law

A: It is not permissible to file a lawsuit to invalidate the awards issued before the ruling ending the arbitration dispute. The general principle that must be taken into account with regard to the arbitrators’ rulings is that it is not permissible to file a lawsuit to invalidate the arbitration award issued during the course of the dispute except after the end of the arbitration dispute, and with the appeal of the ruling ending the entire dispute([ 1]). This principle applies to